THE MEDCOAST INSTITUTE 98:

International Training Program on
Integrated Coastal Management in the Mediterranean & the Black Sea

25 August - 11 September 1998, Ankara, Marmaris / Fethiye, Capadocia, T U R K E Y

 

 
 

Summary Report

 

SPONSORS:
 

  • PEW Fellows Program in Marine Conservation
  • Ministry of Environment (Turkey)
  • United Nations Development Program (UNDP)
  • Mediterranean Action Plan Coordinating Unit (MAP/UNEP)
  • Mediterranean Action Plan, Priority Actions Program, Regional Activity Center (PAP/RAC)
  • Middle East Technical University,

Ocean Engineering Research Center

1. Background and objectives of MEDCOAST Institute
 

 

MEDCOAST Institute is a three-week long intensive training program on integrated coastal management. The curriculum of MEDCOAST Institute is specially designed to address issues and problems, which are particular to or significant for the Mediterranean and the Black Sea.
 

 

MEDCOAST Institute 98 is the fourth successive program, which has been organized annually since 1994. Twenty-five participants representing sixteen countries enrolled in the 94 Institute. MEDCOAST Institute 95 had the participation of twenty-two professionals from fourteen countries. MEDCOAST Institute 96 trained another twenty-two participants from thirteen countries
 

 

The highest priority target group for participation at the MEDCOAST Institutes are the professionals holding mid-managerial positions in their central governments and being responsible for planning and execution of programs or projects on coastal and marine issues. The other groups, in decreasing order of priority are employees of coastal municipalities, non-governmental environmental organizations, universities and research centers.
 

 

MEDCOAST Institute 98, was organized by the MEDCOAST Secretariat between 25 August - 11 September 1998, in Ankara, Marmaris/Fethiye Coast and Cappadocia - Turkey. Twenty-two participants selected from over 100 applications, and representing Albania, Bosnia-Herzegovina, Bulgaria, Egypt, Georgia, Israel Malta, Morocco, Russia, and Tunisia, Turkey, Ukraine, started MEDCOAST Institute 98, and twenty-one participants completed the program. The list of participants of MEDCOAST Institute 98, and the alumni roster of all four MEDCOAST Institutes are given in Annex 1.
 

 

The list of faculty members who contributed to MEDCOAST Institute 98, and the Faculty roster of all four MEDCOAST Institutes are given as Annex 2.
 

 

2. Program
 

 

The program of MEDCOAST Institute 98 consisted of three parts:
 

 

* A week long in-class training including lectures by the faculty on various topics related to ICM in the Mediterranean and the Black Sea, and presentations by participants, and group exercises, held in the attractive campus of the Middle East Technical University (METU) in Ankara (25 - 28 August).
 

 

* A week long study trip and field observations on two traditional wooden boats sailing along the coast from Marmaris to Fethiye (Ölü Deniz), and anchoring at locations of significant coastal conservation and/or development activities for observations, applied research and interviews with various actors of coastal management (29 August - 5 September).
 

 

* A week long concluding workshop with "hands on" training, including lectures by the faculty on topics relevant to the field trip, presentations by the participants on their field observations, group discussion sessions, and a half-day long "simulation game" on an ICM scenario based on field observations held at Kaya Hotel - Club Mediterranée in Cappadocia (6 - 11 September)
 

 

The programs of the in-class activities, and the field trip are given as Annex 3.
 

 

The following topics were studied by the participants during the field trip:
 

 

  • Functions of nature
  • Valuing the coast
  • Water pollution - Water quality management
  • Beaches and beach management
  • Environmental impacts of yacht tourism
  • Role of municipalities in coastal management
  • Coastal tourism
  • Endangered species and their management
  • Coastal resources
  • Coastal issues
  • Coastal use conflicts

Participants presented their reports on these issues during the workshop in Cappadocia, which were then further discussed by the audience.
 

 

Discussion sessions were organized on the following topics in Ankara and in Cappadocia:
 

 

  1. Coastal values, uses and issues at national and regional levels (The Black Sea, Eastern Mediterranean, Adriatic and Southern Mediterranean) (Group work).
  2. Presentations of participants on national coastal management issues and practices (Group work).
  3. Sustainable tourism in the Mediterranean and Black Sea (Group discussion)
  4. Management plan for Dalyan Specially Protected Area (Group discussion)
  5. Environmental impacts and use conflicts at Sarıgerme-Dalaman coast
  6. Functions of nature and environmental function evaluation exercise.
  7. Simulation Game

3. Evaluation
 

 

Each participant of the MEDCOAST INSTITUTE received a course file, which contained the lecture notes discussed during the one-week intensive training at METU and six-day long training in Cappadocia, several references relevant to the lectures, and information about the field trip.
 

 

As the final activity of MEDCOAST Institute 98, the participants were asked to fill in a questionnaire for evaluating the training program. The results of this evaluation are given as Annex 4.
 

 

4. Certificate
 

 

The MEDCOAST INSTITUTE awarded a CERTIFICATE on Integrated Coastal Management to all twenty-one participants who successfully completed the course work, the field investigation, and the final workshop.
 
 
 

 

5. Sponsors
 

 

MEDCOAST Institute 98 was sponsored by the following institutions:
 
 
 

 

  • PEW Fellows Program in Marine Conservation
  • Ministry of Environment (Turkey)
  • United Nations Development Program (UNDP)
  • Mediterranean Action Plan Coordinating Unit (MAP/UNEP)
  • Mediterranean Action Plan, Priority Actions Program, Regional Activity Center (PAP/RAC)
  • Middle East Technical University,

Ocean Engineering Research Center

 

 
 

ALUMNI ROSTER OF THE PAST MEDCOAST INSTITUTES



 

 

94

95

96

98

 

94

95

96

98

Albania

-

-

-

2

Malta

-

1

1

1

Algeria

-

1

1

-

Morocco

1

1

1

1

Bosnia-Herzegovina

-

-

-

1

Palestine

-

2

1

-

Bulgaria

2

-

1

1

Romania

1

1

1

 
Croatia

1

-

1

1

Russia

1

-

2

1

Egypt

1

1

1

1

Slovenia

1

-

-

-

Georgia

1

-

-

1

Spain

1

1

-

-

Israel

1

1

1

1

Syria

1

1

1

-

Italy

1

1

-

-

Tunisia

1

1

1

1

Jordan

1

-

-

-

Turkey

9

8

1

7

Lebanon

-

1

-

-

Ukraine

1

1

-

2

Libya

1

-

-

-

         
          Toplam 25 22 22 21


 
 

FACULTY ROSTER OF THE PAST MEDCOAST INSTITUTES

 

94

95

96

98

- Serap Aşık ( Turkey ) 
  Middle East Technical Univ., Turkey
   

*

*

- Vittorio Barale ( Italy ) 
  Inst. For Remote Sensing Applications, Italy
   

*

*

- Ayşen Ergin ( Turkey )
  Middle East Tech. Univ., Turkey

*

*

*

*

- Baykan Günay ( Turkey ) 
  Middle East Technical Univ., Turkey
   

*

 
- Ljobomir Jeftic ( Croatia ) 
  UNEP MAP Coordinating Unit, Greece
   

*

 
- Joseph Leitman ( USA ) 
  Middle East Technical Univ., Turkey
     

*

- Frank van der Meulen ( The Netherlands )
  International CZM Centre, The Netherlands

*

*

*

*

- Anton Micallef ( Malta )
  Univ. of Malta, Malta
 

*

*

*

- Erdal Ozhan ( Turkey ) 
  Middle East Technical Univ., Turkey

*

*

*

*

- Gerard Pergent ( France ) 
  Univ. of Corsica, France
     

*

- Jens Sorensen ( USA ) 
  Univ. of Massachusetts – Boston, USA

*

*

   
- Malcolm Thomas ( UK )  

*

   
- Ivica Trumbic ( Croatia ) 
  UNEP MAP, PAP / RAC, Croatia
 

*

 

*

- Adalberto Vallega ( Italy ) 
  Univ. of Genoa & ICCOPS, Italy

*

     
- Jentje van der Weide ( The Netherlands )
  Delft Hydraulics, Netherlands

*

*

*

*

- Allan T. Williams ( UK ) 
  BATH SPA Univ. College, U.K.

*

*

 

*


 
 

 

RESULTS OF THE QUESTIONNAIRE


PART: A
 

 

MEDCOAST INSTITUTE
 

 

Question 1:
 

How do you rate each of the following aspects of the MEDCOAST INSTITUTE 98?

5= Very successful     4= successful     3= average

2= unsuccessful         1= highly unsuccessful
 

 

 Selection of the curriculum in particular to issues of the Mediterranean and the Black Sea 

4.1

Generally the MEDCOAST INSTITUTE 98 program 

4.3

One-week long formal lectures on topics related to integrated coastal management in general

4.0

One-week long field trip with boats along the coast from Marmaris to Fethiye (Ölü deniz)

4.1

Choice of visited sites' significance in terms of conservation and/or development activities

4.1

One-week long workshop in Cappadocia (presentations, group discussions)

3.9

The simulation game and choice of scenario

4.0

Lecturers of the MEDCOAST INSTITUTE 98

4.3

Organization of lectures during the first four days at METU

4.3

Organization of the workshop in Cappadocia

4.1

Utilities and social activities

4.2

Organization of travels between Ankara-Marmaris-Cappadocia

3.6

The lecture notes and other documents provided

4.3


 

Question 2:
 

How long ideally should the MEDCOAST Institute: "International Training Program on Coastal Zone Management in the Mediterranean" last? (Please circle).
 

a) less than 1 week         b) 1-2 weeks (6)

c) 2-3 weeks (7)             d) 3-4 weeks (2)

e) 4-5 weeks (1)             f) over 5 weeks
 

PART: B
 

 

CONTENT OF THE PROGRAM
 

 

Question 3:

Please indicate whether you agree or disagree with inclusion of the following topics indicated on the next page, to the curriculum of the future MEDCOAST Institutes by circling the number or code which most closely reflects your opinion.
 
 

 

 Strongly Agree Agree Undecided Disagree Strongly Disagree
SA: 5 A: 4 U: 3 D: 2 SD: 1


 

If the statement does not apply to you, (NA) circle 0.
 
 
 
 

 

Introduction to MEDCOAST and MEDCOAST Institute 98

4.4

Concept and history of integrated coastal management

4.3

Coastal resources and uses 

4.6

Introduction to coastal ecology 

4.3

Hydrodynamics processes 

3.9

Management of marine living resources 

4.1

Engineering technology for shoreline management

4.1

Coastal values, concerns and actions exercise 

3.9

Natural resources and environmental economics

3.9

Land use practices in the coastal zone with special emphasis on specially protected areas 

4.3

Coastal water quality management 

4.3

Sandy coasts and dunes 

3.8

Participants presentations on national coastal management 

issues and practices

4.2

Remote sensing of the coastal zone 

4.1

Integrated marine and coastal GIS 

4.1

Beach aesthetics and rating 

3.7

Coastal litter: management aspects 

4.1

Your role in an ICM team? 

3.9

A general system analogy for the coast 

3.6

Models and coastal information systems 

4.0

EIA for coastal projects 

4.3

Beach Management 

4.2

Sustainable tourism in the Mediterranean and the Black Sea 

(Group discussion)

4.3

Specially protected area management and management plan 

for Dalyan Specially protected Area (Group discussion)

4.3

Functions of nature and environmental function evaluation

4.0

Coastal management legislation: the Turkish case

4.3

PARTICIPANTS' PRESENTATIONS OF FIELD 

STUDY REPORTS

4.3

Environmental impacts and use conflicts at Sangerme Dalaman coast (Group discussion)

4.1

Coastal management component of the 

Mediterranean Action Plan

3.9

Simulation game 

4.4


 

Other (specify)
 

 

Other (specify)
 
 
 

 

PART: C
 

 

QUALIFICATIONS OF THE TARGET GROUP
 

 

Question 4:
 

 

What are the most important qualifications to be considered when deciding on a candidate's eligibility for the MEDCOAST INSTITUTE?
 

 

1=most important     2=second most important     3=third most important
 
 

 

 Educational background (minimum B.Sc. degree in a related field)

1.6

*** M.Sc. degree in a related field

1.5

*** Ph.D. in a related field

2.1

List of publications, if any

2.1

Previous business/employment experience

1.5

English proficiency

1.5

Age range 

2.4

Basic managerial skills

2.3

Diversification of nationalities in the group of participants

1.7

Other (specify), (title of participants; related to environmental sciences)

-

Other (specify), (experience in environmental issues)

-


 

Question 5:
 

 

What must be the important target groups for participants?

1=most important     2=second most important     3=third most important
 
 

 

 High level managers of Government agencies

2.0

Middle level managers of Government agencies

1.6

Employees of Government agencies

1.4

Local government managers

1.5

Local government employees

1.9

Non-Governmental Organisation Managers

2.1

Non-Governmental Organisation employees

2.0

University academic staff

1.8

Research organisation employees

1.6

Private sector people dealing with coastal development

2.1

Other (please specify), (master students)

2.0


 
 

 

PART: D
 

 

SOCIAL AND PERSONAL ASPECTS
 

 

Question 6:

What additional assistance could be useful to make the participants' stay more enjoyable?
 

 

In Ankara:

  • a consultant teacher for student groups
  • an informal meeting on the first day to make people familiar with each other
  • one free day
  • shortening the time period of lectures
  • site seeing in the city and in the campus
  • distribution of a tourist map

During the field trip:

  • a short description of the aims and objectives of the field study topics
  • the boats should be tied up together in order not to divide the participants into groups
  • more detailed explanation about the coastal areas may be given
  • instructors on different boats may be changed in order to learn the ideas of each
  • each boat should have a leader who knows the coastline
  • official meetings should be increased
  • the mayors and the municipality staff should be informed by faculty members, of burning issues
  • some entertainment should take place, keeping the relations seriously to participants

In Cappadocia:

  • half of the participants hesitated to join in social/cultural activities due to entrance fee
  • enjoyable meetings should be held after working hours

Question 7:
 

 

How do you rate the following?
 

 

5=very satisfactory     4=satisfactory     3=average

2=unsatisfactory         1=highly unsatisfactory
 
 

 

 Accommodation at the METU Guest House

4.4

Eating facilities on the campus

3.8

Seminar Hall

4.4

Off-curriculum (social, sports) activity potentials

4.1

Life on the boat

4.3

Accommodation on the boat

4.4

Meals on the boat

4.4

The hotel accommodation in Cappadocia

4.6

Meals in Cappadocia

4.9

Seminar room and facilities provided

4.2

The choice of Cappadocia as the site for the final workshop

4.2


 

PART: E
 

 

PERSONAL DATA
 

 

1. Number of years you have worked for this company/organization?
 
 

 

 Number of years  Number of Persons
< 3 years

6

3-5 years

1

5-10 years

4

10-15 years

4

> 15 years  


 

2. Number of years of previous business or work experience?
 
 

 

 Number of years Number of persons
< 3 years

8

3-5 years

2

5-10 years

2

10-15 years

3

> 15 years  


 

3. Type of previous career experiences
 

 

a) academic field (5)

b) services

c) public sector (5)

d) private sector (2)

e) administration (1)

f) other (NGO): Employee of Government Agency (1)
 
 
 

 

4. Would you recommend your friends to participate at this program in the future?
 

 

5. Yes definitely! (9)     4. Yes (5)     3. Neutral (1)     2. No     1. For Gods sake, no!
 
 

Average = 4.53





 

QUESTION 1 How do you rate each of the following aspects of the MEDCOAST INSTITUTE 98?
 

 

5= Very successful     4= successful     3= average

2= unsuccessful         1= highly unsuccessful
 
 

 

PARTICIPANTS 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 SUM AVE
 Selection of the curriculum in particular to issues of the Mediterranean and the Black Sea  5 4 3 4 4 4 5 5 4 4   4 5 5 3 3 62 4.1
Generally the MEDCOAST INSTITUTE 98 program  4 4 4 4 4 5 5 4 5 4 5 3 5 5 4 4 69 4.3
One-week long formal lectures on topics related to integrated coastal management in general 5 4 3 4 4 5 4 4 4 3 5   4 4 4 3 60 4.0
One-week long field trip with boats along the coast from Marmaris to Fethiye (Ölü deniz) 3 5 3 4 2 5 5 5 5 4 5 5 5 4 3 3 66 4.1
Choice of visited sites' significance in terms of conservation and/or development activities 4 5   4 2 5 5 4 5 3 5 4 5 5 2 4 62 4.1
One-week long workshop in Cappadocia (presentations, group discussions) 5 4 4 4 1 3 5 4 3 4 4 5 5 5 2 4 62 3.9
The simulation game and choice of scenario 5 4 3 4 4 2 5 5 4 4 4 5 5 4 2   60 4.0
Lecturers of the MEDCOAST INSTITUTE 98 5 4 4 4 4 5 5 5 4 5 5 3 4 4 3 4 68 4.3
Organization of lectures during the first four days at METU 5 4 4 4 4 5 5 5 5 5 5 3 4 4 3 4 69 4.3
Organization of the workshop in Cappadocia 5 3 3 4 3 4 5 5 5 4 4 4 5 4 3 4 65 4.1
Utilities and social activities 4 4 3 4 4 5 5 5 4 4 5 4 5 4 2 5 67 4.2
Organization of travels between Ankara-Marmaris-Cappadocia 3 3 2 4 1 5 4 4 3 4 5 4 5 3 3 5 58 3.6
The lecture notes and other documents provided 4 5 3 4 5 5 5 5 5 4 5 4 5 4 2 4 69 4.3

 
QUESTION 3 Please indicate whether you agree or disagree with inclusion of the following topics indicated on the next page, to the curriculum of the future MEDCOAST Institutes

 Strongly Agree Agree Undecided Disagree Strongly Disagree
SA: 5 A: 4 U: 3 D: 2 SD: 1
PARTICIPANTS 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 SUM AVE
Introduction to MEDCOAST and MEDCOAST Institute 98   4   4 5 4 5   5   5 4 4   4   44 4.4
Concept and history of integrated coastal management 3 4 4 4 5 4 5 5 5 4 4 4 4 5 4 5 69 4.3
Coastal resources and uses  4 5 3 4 5 4 5 5 5 4 4 5 5 5 5 5 73 4.6
Introduction to coastal ecology  5 5 4 3 3 4 4 5 4 4 5 4 3 5 5 5 68 4.3
Hydrodynamics processes  5 5 3 5 2 4 4 4 4 3 3 4   4 5 3 58 3.9
Management of marine living resources  3 4 4 4 3 4 5 5 4 4 3 5 4 5 5 4 66 4.1
Engineering technology for shoreline management 4 5 5 5 3 4 3 1 5 5 4 4 3 4 5 5 65 4.1
Coastal values, concerns and actions exercise  3 5 4 3 4 4 4 2 5 3 4 5 3 4 5 5 63 3.9
Natural resources and environmental economics 4 4 3 1 3 4 4 4 5 4 4 4 4 5 4 5 62 3.9
Land use practices in the coastal zone with special emphasis on specially protected areas  5 5 5 1 4 4 5 4 5 4 5 5 4 5 4 4 69 4.3
Coastal water quality management    4 4 2 4 4 5 5 5 3 5 5 5 5 4 5 65 4.3
Sandy coasts and dunes  5 5 3 3 3 4 4 1 5 4 4 4 5   4 3 57 3.8
Participants presentations on national coastal management 

issues and practices

3 5 5 2 5 4 3 5 5 4 4 5 3 5 4 5 67 4.2
Remote sensing of the coastal zone  4 5 5 4 2 4 3 5 4 4 3 5 4 4 4 5 65 4.1
Integrated marine and coastal GIS  3 5 4 4 2 4 4 5 4 3 5 5 4 4 4 5 65 4.1
Beach aesthetics and rating  3 4 3 3 4 4 3 1 5 4 4 4 4 5 4 4 59 3.7
Coastal litter: management aspects  4 5 3 4 4 4 4 2 5 5 4 4 4 5 5 4 66 4.1
Your role in an ICM team?  4 5 2 3 5 4 3 3 5 4 4 3   4 5 4 58 3.9
A general system analogy for the coast  5 4 2 2 3 4 4 2 5 3 3 5 3 4 4 5 58 3.6
Models and coastal information systems  4 4   2 3 4 5 4 5 4 5 4 3 4 4 5 60 4.0
EIA for coastal projects  4 5 3 2 5 4   4 5   5 4 5 4 5 5 60 4.3
Beach Management  3 5 3 4 5 4 5   5 3 4 4 4 5 5 4 63 4.2
Sustainable tourism in the Mediterranean and the Black Sea 

(Group discussion)

4 5 3 3 5 4 5 5 5 3 4 5 2 5 5 5 68 4.3
Specially protected area management and management plan 

for Dalyan Specially protected Area (Group discussion)

5 5 3 3 5 4 5 5 4 5 5 5 2 5 4 4 69 4.3
Functions of nature and environmental function evaluation 3 5 4 3 3 4 5 3 5 3   5 4 4 5 4 60 4.0
Coastal management legislation: the Turkish case 3 5 5 4 5 4 4 4 5 5 3 4 4 4 5 4 68 4.3
PARTICIPANTS' PRESENTATIONS OF FIELD 

STUDY REPORTS

3 5 5 4 5 4   5 5 4 5 5 2 4 4 5 65 4.3
Environmental impacts and use conflicts at Sangerme Dalaman coast (Group discussion) 5 5 2 3 5 4 3 5 4 5 5 4 2 5 4 4 65 4.1
Coastal management component of the 

Mediterranean Action Plan

4 5 3 3 4 4 3 5 3 4   4 3 4 4 5 58 3.9
Simulation game  4 5 5 4 5 4 3 5 5 4 4 5 2 5 5 5 70 4.4


 
 

 

QUESTION 4 What are the most important qualifications to be considered when deciding on a candidate's eligibility for the MEDCOAST INSTITUTE?
 

1=most important 2=second most important 3=third most important
 
 

 

PARTICIPANTS 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 SUM AVE
 Educational background (minimum B.Sc. degree in a related field) 1   2 1 1 3 1       2   1     2 14 1.6
*** M.Sc. degree in a related field 2 1 2 2 3 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 1 1 24 1.5
*** Ph.D. in a related field 2 1 2 3 3 2 2 2 2 2 3   3   2 1 30 2.1
List of publications, if any 3 2 2 3 3 1 2 1 3 2 3   3   1 1 30 2.1
Previous business/employment experience 2 2 2 1 2 2 1 1 2 1 2 2 1   1 1 23 1.5
English proficiency 1 3 2 1 1 2 1 2 2 1 1 3 1 1 1 1 24 1.5
Age range  3 3 2 1 3 3 1 3 3 2 2   3   2 2 33 2.4
Basic managerial skills 2 2 3 2 2 3 2 2 1 2 3   2 3 2 3 34 2.3
Diversification of nationalities in the group of participants 1 2 2 3 1 3 2 1 3 1 1       1 1 22 1.7
Other (specify), (title of participants; related to environmental sciences)     3                         1 4 2.0
Other (specify), (experience in environmental issues)     3                         1 4 2.0


 
 

 

QUESTION 5 What must be the important target groups for participants?

1=most important     2=second most important     3=third most important
 
 
 

 

PARTICIPANTS 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 SUM AVE
 High level managers of Government agencies 2 1   1   3 2 2 1 2 2 2 2 2 3 3 28 2.0
Middle level managers of Government agencies 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 3 1 2 2 1 2 2 2 2 26 1.6
Employees of Government agencies 1 1   1   1 1 3 1 1 2 1 1 2 2 1 19 1.4
Local government managers 1 1 2 1 2 1 2 3 2 1 1 1 1 2 1 2 24 1.5
Local government employees 2 3   1   2 1 3 3 2 1 1 3 2 2 1 27 1.9
Non-Governmental Organisation Managers 1 2 3 3   2 2 1 2 2 3 2 2 2 2 2 31 2.1
Non-Governmental Organisation employees 2 3   3   1 1 1 2 2 3 2 3 2 2 1 28 2.0
University academic staff 1 2   1   3 1 1 3 1 3 3 1 2 1 2 25 1.8
Research organisation employees 2 1   1   1 1 1 3 1 3 3 2 2 1 1 23 1.6
Private sector people dealing with coastal development 1 1   3 3 3 1 1 2 2 3 2 3 2 1 3 31 2.1
Other (please specify), (master students) 2                               2 2.0


 
 
 
 

 

QUESTION 7 How do you rate the following?
 

 

5=very satisfactory     4=satisfactory     3=average

2=unsatisfactory         1=highly unsatisfactory
 
 
 
 

 

  1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 SUM AVE
 Accommodation at the METU Guest House 5 5   3   4 4 5 4 4 5 5 4   5 4 57 4.4
Eating facilities on the campus 3 3 3 4   4 4 3 4 3   5 4 5 5 3 53 3.8
Seminar Hall 4 5 4 5 4 5 4 5 4 5 4 5 2 4 5 5 70 4.4
Off-curriculum (social, sports) activity potentials 2 4 3 5 3 5 4 5 4 4 5 5 3 5 4 4 65 4.1
Life on the boat 3 5 3 2 5 5 4 5 5 5 4 5 5 2 5 5 68 4.3
Accommodation on the boat 5 5 2 4 4 5 4 5 5 5 4 5 5 4 5 4 71 4.4
Meals on the boat 3 5 3 4 4 5 3 5 5 5 4 5 5 5 5 4 70 4.4
The hotel accommodation in Cappadocia 5 5 4 4 4 3 4 4 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 73 4.6
Meals in Cappadocia 5 5 4 4 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 78 4.9
Seminar room and facilities provided 5 4 4 3 4 4 4 4 3 5 5 5 3 4 5 5 67 4.2
The choice of Cappadocia as the site for the final workshop 3 5 4 1 4 5 4 5 5 5 3 3 5 5 5 5 67 4.2


 
 
 
 

 

Copyright © 2012 Mediterranean Coastal Foundation. All rights reserved.